Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Luk, hi Frank, > > On Do, 18 Jun 2009, Norbert Preining wrote: >> On Do, 11 Jun 2009, Frank Küster wrote: >>> I am right now uploading an again-installable tetex-bin to >>> oldstable-proposed-updates (I hope that's correct?), and texlive-bin >>> will follow soon. Both uploads have been built in etch pbuilder chroots, >>> and have been tested to fix the problem. >>> >>> The changes are small, essentially only one patch file is added, and >>> except for the changelog one file in debian/ is changed, namely the >>> quilt series file (for tetex-bin) or the dpatch 00list file. The >>> patch is attached. >>> >>> >>> Do we need to do anything else (besides fixing stable and sid, but that >>> isn't urgent since the bug won't show up soon)? >> sid will be fixed soon, but I have uploaded >> texlive-bin 2007.dfsg.2-4+lenny1 >> to proposed-stable-updates which includes the same fix as tetex and >> texlive-bin 2005 uploaded by Frank. > > One more problem was found: While the generation of latex format was > fixed by this change in the correct way, the generation of three other > formats (cslatex/pdfcslatex from texlive-lang-czechslovak, xelatex > from texlive-xetex, and mllatex from texlive-formats-extra) are also > broken because they *stop* at the warning message and do not generate > the format. > > The latex.ini file that is loaded when generating the (pdf)latex formats > contains the line > \scrollmode > which makes the engine (pdftex/...) *not* stop at the respective > message. Unfortunately that line is missing from mllatex.ini, > cslatex.ini, xelatex.ini. > > I have prepared: > texlive-base 2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny2 > texlive-lang 2007.dfsg.4-1+lenny1 > texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.17-1~lenny02 > for stable-proposed updates. > > The last one would replace the ~lenny01 package that is already in > stable. > > The texlive-lang is the first update for stable. > > The question is about the first, texlive-base, where I have already > uploaded one version (~lenny1) to stable-proposed-updates, but that has > not been accepted by now. > > Should I upload a new ~lenny1 with the additional fixes or should I > upload ~lenny1 for that package?
You should not reuse changelog entries unless they were not uploaded or made public yet. Please upload accordingly. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
