Le Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 06:20:42AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : > > At the risk of asking a silly question: isn't that addressed by Build-Depends > vs Build-Depends-Indep? > > e...@ron:~/src/debian/CRAN$ grep -h ^Build-Depends-Indep */debian/control | > head -5 > Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), r-base-dev (>> 2.3.0), cdbs > Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), r-base-dev (>= 2.8.1), cdbs > Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), r-base-dev (>= 2.9.0), cdbs > Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), r-base-dev (>= 2.9.0), cdbs > Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), r-base-dev (>= 2.9.0), cdbs, > r-cran-lattice (>= 0.10.11), r-cran-vr, r-cran-colorspace
Hi Dirk, since debhelper and cdbs, and therfore r-base-dev, are necessary to run debian/rules clean, they need to be listed in the Build-Depends (not-indep) field even if no architecture dependant package is built (Policy § 7.7). Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
