Hi Albin! On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:41:07 +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: >> menu-xdg alone does nothing and it needs menu: [...] >> Please do not add other dependencies, especially if they can be avoided: >> 2MB can be a lot on an embedded system like the Openmoko devices. >> Instead, keep providing a fallback menu. >> > > Ok, guess I'll make it a Recommends, though
Thank you! >> Attached a patch to render the enlightenment-applications.menu >> freedesktop.org compliant, based on my personal preferences :-) > > I think it's fine, except this part: > >> <Name>System Tools</Name> >> <Include><And><Category>System</Category> >> <Not><Category>Settings</Category></Not></And> >> </Include> >> </Menu> >> <Menu> >> <Name>Settings</Name>g >> <Include><And><Category>Settings</Category> >> <Not><Category>System</Category></Not></And> >> </Include> >> </Menu> >> </Menu> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > You're explicitely excluding .desktops being in both Settings and System. This > is unfortunate, as on my machine, at least synaptic.desktop, > polkit-gnome-authorization.desktop and gparted.desktop are among them, and if > I was actually using a menu, I would miss them. Yes, I thought about that and I found strange that an application declares itself for both categories: either you are modifying the settings or you are dealing with the system, not the two at the same time. Never mind, it seems we need to deal with it... > I think I'd better keep Settings and Administration from the previous menu > instead. (FYI, gnome splits 'settings and not system' in 'settings', and > 'settings and system' in 'administration', that's why I'm currently doing so. > There's a use case for it) > Any suggestion ? Nope, yours is the correct way to solve the problem. I still prefer "System Tools" over "Administration", but this is my personal taste and I do not mind at all if the menu is working as expected ;-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpTAvP7Znv5y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
