severity 481132 wontfix notforwarded 481132 thanks "brian m. carlson" <sand...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> writes:
> Apparently OpenSSL doesn't try to use kEDH, and so it doesn't fail. > GnuTLS should implement the same behavior; if a certificate doesn't > support digitalSignature, then GnuTLS shouldn't try to use it in that > way. RSA key exchange is fine for what I need. I looked into this further, and we cannot implement this for the reason Nikos explained -- in TLS, the server chose the ciphersuite to use. The client cannot avoid advertising support for DHE ciphers based on the server certificate, since it hasn't seen the server certificate when sending the client hello. We don't want to mimic OpenSSL's behaviour. The reason OpenSSL works in this situation is, if I understand correctly, because OpenSSL clients list non-DHE ciphers as preferred over DHE ciphers. So your server would chose the non-DHE cipher by default, and things would work. I don't think that is a good idea from a security perspective. GnuTLS clients should advertise preference for DHE ciphers. Finally, servers shouldn't chose DHE ciphers if they cannot support. As far as I can tell you have these options: 1) Reconfigure the server to not (incorrectly) announce support for DHE ciphers. 2) Regenerate certificates with the digitalSignature bit set. 3) Report a bug against the server to make it avoid chose a DHE ciphersuite when the certificate does not have the digitalSignature bit. 4) Configure the client to not prefer DHE ciphers over non-DHE ciphers. This would mimic the OpenSSL behaviour, but does not enforce the sub-optimal configuration on all GnuTLS users. A GnuTLS priority string "PERFORMANCE" is sufficient -- it prefers non-DHE ciphers over DHE because non-DHE is faster. I could be wrong somewhere, so please let me know if you see a way to actually make things work better in your case without worsening security for all users. /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org