Package: libvte9
Version: 1:0.20.1-1
Severity: wishlist

Hello,
Thanks for the quick soname bump to libvte.so.10
(in Debian new queue currently).

However, VTE 0.20.5 has undone the unintended .soname bump.
We should keep using libvte.so.9 (libvte9) currently.

I report this bug to prevent someone to rebuild all VTE applications
against libvte.so.10 (libvte10).
(I am the maintainer of evilvte. Evilvte works fine with VTE 0.20.5 aka
libvte.so.9.)

Kind regards
 Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to