On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:02:20 +0200 Luca Capello <l...@pca.it> wrote: > Package: gpe-gallery > Version: 0.97-3 > Severity: minor
> Hello, > > the .desktop file looks for gpe-gallery.png while only the .xpm version Bah - this is getting really annoying. If Debian is going to stick with two menu systems, why do we also have to stick with two icon formats? (And why did we choose the *BIGGER* icon format of XPM? It's *double* the size of the equivalent PNG for foo sake.) The other mystery is that the desktop icon shows up fine on my own Sid systems. Has something changed to allow the XPM to show up when a PNG doesn't exist in some cases? $ ls /usr/share/pixmaps/gpe-gallery.* /usr/share/pixmaps/gpe-gallery.xpm $ grep Icon /usr/share/applications/gpe-gallery.desktop Icon=gpe-gallery.png $ find /usr/share/ -name gpe-gallery.png $ Yet, I get an icon for the GNOME and Debian menus. Is this just an aberration (because the icon concerned is - visually - identical to the gthumb icon) or some new feature? (For the fix itself, I'm going to migrate those manual install rules into a gpe-gallery.install file and cut out all the extra stuff in debian/rules, then add the PNG.) -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpcv13L3I7mx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
