Luk Claes wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: > >> Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> wrote: > >> After that, the build fails to to a problem unrelated to texlive: >> >> Unpacking libgtk2.0-0 (from .../libgtk2.0-0_2.16.1-2_hppa.deb) ... >> dpkg-deb: subprocess <decompress> killed by signal (Segmentation fault) >> dpkg: error processing >> /srv/chroots/sid/var/cache/apt/archives/libgtk2.0-0_2.16.1-2_hppa.deb >> (--unpack): >> short read in buffer_copy (backend dpkg-deb during >> `./usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.1600.1') >> [...] >> Errors were encountered while processing: >> /srv/chroots/sid/var/cache/apt/archives/libgtk2.0-0_2.16.1-2_hppa.deb >> /srv/chroots/sid/var/cache/apt/archives/libxine1-console_1.1.16.3-1_hppa.deb >> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) >> apt-get failed. >> Package installation failed >> Trying to reinstall removed packages: >> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: >> >> Later on, texlive-base is only the last package to fail, therefore it >> got the bug report. But in fact, dbus is the first - anyway that doesn't >> matter since the system seems to be hosed anyway. > > How does that not matter? > > buildd.d.o is not the place to reassign bugs for particular buildds to. > If it's just for particular buildds, you'd better contact the buildd > admin like you did. > > Though it's strange that you rely on the bug submitter to fix the bug... > > Lets have a look at the build log and see if we can find the actual > problem, maybe it is dbus causing this...
The hppa problem seems to be coming from random segfaults which is a known porter problem. :-( The ia64 problem seems to be an issue in one of the tex* packages as far as I can see from a first sight, maybe another build log can show us that is not the case though? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
