On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 02:49:27PM -0400, Nasser Mohieddin Abukhdeir wrote: > Package: libpam-modules > Version: 1.0.1-5+lenny1 > Severity: important
> Hello: > After reading through the original bug report and the one submitted > to Ubuntu (#327597), I think there is some issue, at least with trying > to change the memlock limits. > So, before touching anything: > nas...@rey2:~$ ulimit -l > 32 > nas...@rey2:~$ ulimit -H -l > 32 > Note that this machine is an LDAP client for authentication via > libpam-ldap. After adding these lines to an otherwise empty > /etc/security/limits.conf: > * hard memlock unlimited > * soft memlock unlimited > and double checking that in the file /etc/pam.d/sshd is uncommented: > # Set up user limits from /etc/security/limits.conf. > session required pam_limits.so I believe this bug is fixed in libpam-modules 1.0.1-9 in squeeze. Unfortunately it's non-trivial to install this package on lenny (rather, it's non-trivial to roll it back after testing, since this introduces a significant change to the config file handling), so I can't really advise you to test this on your system unless you mean to stick with the squeeze version of PAM afterwards. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
