On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > Even though the original codebase might be unclean, and it is uncertain > whether snacc should be replaced by eSnacc, I don't see any reason why > this proposed bugfix is not applied to make the package build. > > Other packages have build-dependencies on snacc (I originally just > wanted to compile kismet on amd64)...
Sorry for the late reply: The reason for the delay is that snacc is orphaned and neither the to-be maintainer, Martin von Loewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, nor the ex-maintainer (me) seem to have much time. Now we have to wait for the Big C++ ABI Bang anyway, so don't expect any action before that smoke evaporated. Cheers, WB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
