John D. Hendrickson schreef: > * cmucl binary names "lisp.core" using strings(1) but you distribute the > file as lisp-dist.core.
This is intentional: when the package installs it will compile and then load common-lisp-controller and save a new image as lisp.core. > * only platform is i386 I only have a i386 to build the package on. In future there is a possibility of having other architectures, but for 90% of the users out there x86 is the only architecture that matters. If you want cross-architecture development, please use sbcl. > * startup shows compile corruption due to compiling phase sorry? Could you give an example? > * site-init doesn't seem to be the origional and look like it loads > * itself recursively (that's what happened to me) This should not happen, could you give a typescript > Are my problems that I installed this from Sarge BEFORE it became > official? Because it seems by package file list things would be > more or less the same. The differences between the pre versions and the final 19b seem slight. But I suspect a few of your problems are because you have a mixed non-debian/debian cmucl installation. > 1) I see quite allot of diffs of clisp to the networking and password section. > Why does cmucl need this? clisp? > 2) what is "asdf" and why isn't it part of the origional distribution? Please see http://www.cliki.net/asdf > 3) why does > > cmucl_19a-release-20040728-11.diff > > Include diffs to > > lisp.core > > When lisp.core is cmucl binary that has to be built - a large part of > lisp - which - I might add - makes lisp impossible to use if not built > with lisp(1) binary? It the diff contains a lisp.core patch then this is an error of packaging. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
