At Sun, 24 May 2009 17:19:29 +0200,
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> 
> * Junichi Uekawa <[email protected]>, 2009-05-24, 23:02:
> >> The bug does not seem to be fixed at all.
> >> cowdancer still depends on cowbuilder, which depends on pbuilder.
> >> 
> >
> > cowbuilder dependency is for backward compatibility, will be removed
> > after squeeze is released.
> Then the bug should be kept open until it is really fixed.
> 
> However, I believe that introducing a (temporary) recursive dependency 
> is a suboptimal way to split a packages.

I don't agree packages should be split at all (users will lose
functionality). This is a compromise to keep this dependency for one
release cycle.

-- 
dan...@{netfort.gr.jp,debian.org}



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to