Le May 22, 2009 06:54:11 am Rene Engelhard, vous avez écrit : > [ what if you would format your mails sanely so that it's possible > to sanely cite it. As usual, line break after 72 chars.. ] I'd like to know what's insane about avoiding to insert random line feeds. > > Hi, > > Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > I figured after much time that Debian's OOo is actually Go-oo, or something > > like that. I then realized that Go-oo was mentioned in the copyright file, > > twice in the changelog, and in the Homepage field, which doesn't even show > > in my package manager. > > So what? So it's not abnormal that it took me much time to figure out that openoffice.org is actually Go-oo. > > > I'd like Go-oo to be mentioned more proheminently, probably in the package > > description(s). > > No way. > > > I don't know exactly what's Debian's OOo compared to Go-oo > > It is Go-oo (well, 99%). Shown by setting the Homepage: field.
If you had red the first sentence, you'd have noticed that I already noticed the Homepage field. > > > I'm not asking to remove the OOo branding, just to make it clear that this > > isn't real OOo (and perhaps explaining the differences a bit). > [...] > > Long story short: no, I won't do that and tagged this already wontfix. > > When we ever renamed the packags to go-oo-* this will be closed, until then > I have one more bogus(useless bug in my bug list *sighs* Please kind in mind that not all users maitain openoffice.org, and therefore can hardly guess that it is Go-oo if you simply tell them the package is OOo. Until the description, the name or whatever clarifies, a bug report will hardly be a superfluous complement to the Homepage field to help those wondering. > > Grüße/Regards, > > René Thanks anyway for explaining the relation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
