notfound 529621 close 529621 thanks Jelle de Jong <jelledej...@powercraft.nl> wrote:
Hi, > Clients can scan again, bug can be closed, or check the udev packages to > see if the lp vs saned group id is correct? First, you're using an HP scanner with hplip, so that's all hplip's fault (really). Second, libsane doesn't have udev rules for scanners supported by hplip except for a few scanners that are actually also supported by a backend in libsane. In this case, the last rule evaluated wins. And yes, the situation with hplip and MFPs really sucks as there's no way to distinguish between scan and print. Maybe creating a second device node for the usb device would be worth a try, but then the backend would have to look for that second node. Try taking that to the hplip folks, in the unlikely event they are actually interested in fixing that one of these days. They're in my "come to talk to me if you're actually interested in getting things done properly" category. Or we should try ACLs one of these days, but (IIRC) that's not supported with udev and (still IIRC) tmpfs doesn't support ACLs either. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jbla...@debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
