Patrick Ohly wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 08:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>0.9 beta 1 doesn't require anything from Funambol. Everything is
>dual-licensed LGPLv2.1/3.0.
>Regarding packaging: I still consider 0.8.1 the current stable version.
>0.9 beta 1 works, but we still have to redo lots of interoperability
>testing (and add some: vCalendar 1.0 now also works).
Hi Patrick, Yves-Alexis;
Thanks for the new information. Here is where the packaging stands for me
- packaging libfunambol client stack is done, although not
tested
- I got stalled on syncevolution with some problems related to libfunambol
not
being built in the same tree.
- syncevolution has slipped down my packaging queue behind other stuff
more related to $REAL_JOB, but I haven't given up on it.
I do wonder if there is enough other motivation to put the funambol
stack into debian if it is not going to be used by syncevolution. If
not, then we should make the leap to 0.9 beta 1; probably all the
kinks will be worked out by the next Debian release.
d
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
