On Thursday 14 May 2009 12:29:53 Julien BLACHE wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote: > > +. /lib/lsb/init-functions > > I'm not sure I want to bring that on board. Any rationale behind its > use here?
Well, you could implement the equivalent of status_of_proc yourself, which would be about 30 to 50 lines of shell code that someone has already written for you. /lib/lsb/init-functions doesn't impose anything on you. You don't have to do anything about the rest of the init script or its output. And it is already pretty much an essential package because a lot of the init scripts in the base system use it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
