On jeu, 2009-04-16 at 15:53 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > I'm not sure the content of my mail reached the maintainer (it wasnt > shown on the BTS), so I'm resending it just to be sure: > > It seems that the support was never there. I don't really know about > 2.6.24 kernels, but definitely it's not working with 2.6.29. Debian > kernel had reactivated the option needed for the /proc/acpi/battery > stuff to work, and this was choosen preferably by acpitool, so nobody > noticed that before now, that the option was again disabled. > > Looking at the source code, it seems that, first, it tries to skip to > many lines (5) from the /sys/class/power_supply/*/uevent and so think > the battery is not present. > But even correcting that, other fields are not correctly parsed anyway.
Hmhm, is there anybody out there? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
