It's been a week or so and there's been no fix for botan-devel bug 527461 (SONAME bumped without binary package name change). Meanwhile there *has* been a new upstream release of my package, monotone, which depends on botan.
1) Would an NMU of botan-devel to be welcome? The fix seems pretty straightforward, except that I'm not 100% sure what you (Adeodato) meant when you said the shlibs file for libbotan1.8 v1.8.2 is "bogus". Is it just the absence of (>= 1.8.2-1) at the end of the line? 2) Assuming I did such an NMU, should I wait to upload monotone until after that NMU has hit unstable? Note that I would need a sponsor for the NMU (my usual sponsor for monotone has very little time to spend on Debian these days). Thanks, zw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
