Hi Sven, On Tuesday 12 May 2009, Sven Velt wrote: > I *would* prefer "check_nscp" as the author named the software. But yes, > it would be a nice solution (independent of chosen command_name) for the > Debian packages.
okay ... point taken. :) > Maybe we could add another one with "-l '$ARGV2'" add... ;-) Hmm ... I personly prefer general solutions and the one just with $ARGV1 is one in my eyes ... beside the documentaion shipped with nagios (upstream and with our package), where they use also $ARGV2, we didn't reference anything about such a way in our package. Why should we use different checks, if we can do the same with one? For example "check_command check_nt!'MEMUSE -w 80 -c 90'" works like a charm. With kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to <w...@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
