On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:25:25PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > i would have been happier to push the soon to come 2.6.30 for lenny+half, > > but that looks impossible due to the multiple security support > > that our team currently has to handle going from > > oldstable 2.6.18 and 2.6.24, stable 2.6.26 and of course > > the easy 2.6.29 in sid. > > hm, so do you think lenny+half will not happen or how should I understand > that? I assume it will not be much easier once .30 is in sid, because 2 > months later, there will be .31 in sid and you'd have to take care for 5 > kernel versions again?!
the point is that lenny+half is delayed up until manpower is freed by no longer supporting the etch linux-2.6 images. that contradicts somehow the lenny+half intention as by that time typicaly squeeze starts to get mass installed. if you take a look back same story happened for etch: 2.6.18 -> 2.6.26 etch+half uses 2.6.24 (although there were also some upstream reasons, due to unstable dynamic ticks and bug friends that i no longer remember). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
