On dim, 2009-05-03 at 17:50 -0400, Jerry Quinn wrote: > It's one thing for an experienced computer person to say "okay, it's > harmless" and ignore the message. But if it's harmless, why are we > printing it in the first place?
To warn user that something isn't available. > > Perhaps this should be minor, but it shouldn't be closed. Well, we have a gazillon of evolution bugs, and we definitely need help. So yes, bug triaging might be a bit harsh, sorry. Oh and for the record, I forgot to precise in the previous mail, but there is no warning printed here, and I don't use network manager either (this is on 2.26) Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
