forwarded 526229 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6301 thanks
Quoting Mario Lipinski (l...@gymszbad.de): > Package: samba > Version: 2:3.3.3-1.1 > Severity: normal > > See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6301 > Applying the patch solved the problem here. > I experienced the problem with the current samba version in stable and > testing. Well, OK. So, what is really the value added by reporting in Debian BTS a bug that has already been reported, analyzed and *fixed* upstream? In don't want to sound rude, but what you're just asking us is to make double work by hooking up on upstream BTS, check in what version this is fixed....and wait for an upcoming version to fix the bug anyway. I'm not in favor of applying the patch. Diverging from upstream is pointless at this point of development. As they have a very regular upload schedule that guarantees us that the bug will be fixed in an upcoming 3.3.* version, there would be no point in applying this patch, imho. Really, please, this is a plea to all users of Samba in Debian: until we are getting close to the release of squeeze, please *don't* make double bug reports when issues are already dealt with and known by the Samba Team....unless you think that the bug makes the samba package completely unsuitable for release (ie is release critical). Many thanks for your care reporting, still. Again, I don't want to be rude but more try to save our scarce resources!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature