On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:11:06PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Jelmer Vernooij: > > > The recent work on using a rich root format by default has made it a > > lot less necessary to work with different formats, so that should at > > least reduce the likeliness of having multiple formats that bzr has to > > convert between. > > Fair enough. > > > Alternatively, do you think it would perhaps be useful if bzr warned > > when it had to do a slow conversion when fetching? > > Maybe, but if the dichotomy slowly disappears and most of the > repositories are either created or converted to the rich-root world, > then I can understand that there's no real need to go to extra effort > for what's essentially a disappearing problem. Unless the rich-root > variants won't be made the default for some time yet.
The bzrtools upstream repo has been converted to a rich-root format just now, the idea is to see how that pans out, incorporate lessons learned, upgrade bzr.dev, disseminate. It won't all happen this week, but I expect things to be rolling by 1.17. Wouter van Heyst -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
