On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > > We can obviously do this, > > > however, I think that we should move the conditional config based on > > > the debconf question to the top of the config script. > > > > You have to ask it if not flagged as seen in this case. Also this > > violates "debconf is no registry". > > > Well, I'm not sure that the "debconf is not a registry" karma actually > really means something. I have to think about this. Anyway, we will > fix this after the 4.0.3-36 release.
The same way we removed the "enable md5" question a while ago (actually, Karl did it before we arrived), shouldn't we remove this question as well? Is there any situation where shadow is a bad thing? I mean, does someone somewhere on the earth really need this feature? Bye, Mt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
