Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: [email protected]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch jaunty
There seems no obvious reason why mindi and related packages aren't
built on ia64; and the fact that mindi and mondo are built on amd64 but
mindi-busybox isn't just seems odd. Does this change make sense?
diff --git a/Packages-arch-specific b/Packages-arch-specific
index cbf0c98..2c1b92b 100644
--- a/Packages-arch-specific
+++ b/Packages-arch-specific
@@ -240,8 +240,8 @@ memtest86: i386 amd64 lpia
# i386 memory tester (bypasses OS entirely)
%mga-vid: !m68k #
[ANAIS]
%micro-evtd: arm armel # driver
for the micro controller of a arm-based NAS
%mig: hurd-i386 #
hurd cross compiler
-mindi: i386 amd64 # i386
boot disk creator
-%mindi-busybox: i386 # [ANAIS]
depends mindi
+mindi: i386 amd64 ia64 # i386
boot disk creator
+%mindi-busybox: i386 amd64 ia64 #
[ANAIS] depends mindi
%mit-scheme: i386 #
Circular self-build-depends (requires itself to build itself)
mknbi: i386 # i386
specific
mkrboot: i386 # i386
boot loader utilities
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ mlton: amd64 i386 hppa powerpc sparc
# Self-hosting ML compiler
mocka: i386 # i386
only compiler
%mol: powerpc #
Mac-on-linux; requires a powerpc.
%mol-drivers-linux: powerpc #
Mac-on-linux; requires a powerpc
-mondo: i386 amd64 # needs
mindi
+mondo: i386 amd64 ia64 # needs
mindi
%mono: amd64 i386 powerpc arm armel ia64 s390 sparc kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-amd64 lpia # needs per-architecture porting
morse: i386 # i386
specific
%mozart: !alpha !ia64 !amd64 !kfreebsd-amd64 # 'who
would ever need > 32-bits??'
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [[email protected]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
