On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:36 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On lun, 2009-04-13 at 21:51 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > > 
> > > Format: 1.8
> > > Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:06:18 +0200
> > > Source: makebootfat
> > > Binary: makebootfat
> > > Architecture: source amd64
> > > Version: 1.4-2
> > > Distribution: unstable
> > > Urgency: low
> > > Maintainer: Soeren Sonnenburg <so...@debian.org>
> > > Changed-By: Soeren Sonnenburg <so...@debian.org>
> > > Description: 
> > >  makebootfat - Utility to creates a bootable FAT filesystem
> > > Closes: 523891
> > > Changes: 
> > >  makebootfat (1.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
> > >  .
> > >    * Recommend syslinux-common package and clarify in README.Debian that
> > >    mbr.bin can be found in there (Closes: #523891)
> > >    * Bump standards version (no changes required).
> 
> Hi,
> 
> is the mbr.bin file from syslinux the same as mbrfat.bin from
> makebootfat? Because makebootfat manpage specifically recommends the
> mbrfat.bin in case one wants to make an USB-FDD compatible disk.

Yes you are right - it is a completely differnet file :/

Soeren,
-- 
For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it
will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to