Hi Andres, On Dienstag, 14. April 2009, Andres Mejia wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. Didn't know I received this email.
no problem, 0.36 is still not released.
> Actually, what's happening by default is that a set of packages in a
> changes file are processed together per each individual changes file given
> on the command line. Then each individual package given on the command line
> is processed in a single group.
That's the current, updated wording now:
When processing changes files, by default, all packages in a changes file will
be processed together with all individual packages given on the command line.
Then each package given on the command line is processed in a single group.
If the '--single-changes-list' is used, the packages in all changes files are
processed together along with any individual packages that were given on the
command line.
Is that accurate? :)
> The way it sounds with the grammar change is that each package in a changes
> file will be processed together with any individual packages given on the
> command line.
Wouldnt that be more sensible? At least in most of the packages I know one
doesnt want to install all binary packages from one package together...
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
