2009/4/14 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Miriam,
Hi :) > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:30:39PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: >>2009/4/13 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>: >>> Gnash 0.8.5 was released for Debian Sid the other day, and works >>> nicely for me - I have now watched a youtube video online for the >>> first time ever (I've used clive till now). Other flash sites, like >>> the british mikmik webdesign website that interests my girlfriend, >>> works too. >>> >>> I have backportet the new Gnash to Lenny for i386 and amd64. Add to >>> /etc/apt/sources.lst the line below, if you want it: >> >>Did you finally have to backport libtool or patch the source code >>somehow? If so, please, send me your changes and I'll upload a newer >>release :) > > [You wrote me in private. I have taken the liberty of responding through > the related bugreport, to share our discussion with the public] No problem, I just forgot to CC the bug report :) > I backported libtool 2.x. > > If the Gnash package had used CDBS I could enable libtool regeneration > elegantly in only a few lines, and would be happy to share the changes. I'm not really that proficient in CDBS and I don't really have so much spare time right now for learning it properly. I understand that Gnash might be a package complex enough for needing to understand how CDBS works and not just blindly use it. I might switch to it in the future though, but I need to have time to properly switch to it. > Gnash packaging use a more classical packaging style that would require > more care to do the same thing. Not much work, probably, but enough > that I chose to not spend time on ensuring the sanity and stability of > various rebuilt autotools, but found it quicker to setup a chain of > build environments and backport that newer libtool. > > If interested in CDBS-style packaging, then have a look at unicap (which > contains nice patches from you already!) for a recent and relatively > complex autotools package, and sugar-toolkit-0.86 (yes, the version > number _is_ part of the source package name!) for a recent simpler > example enabling autotools regeneration but only when flagged to do so > (i.e. not on build daemons!). Thanks, I'll have a look at it when I have time :) > The simplest fix for this bug is to tighten build-dependency to be on > libtool (>= 2) and build-depend on libltdl-dev (which was only provided > by libtool 2.x) instead of libltdl3-dev (which is a transitional package > in Sid and won't work in the earlier releases when it was a real > package. ...or at least that is my understanding (I might be wrong). I'll do that then. I was just waiting to see if you got it working with a lower version of libtool. > Hope that helps. Yup, it does :) Thanks, Miry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
