Dnia środa 08 kwiecień 2009 o 14:49:23 napisałeś: > > I don't understand, why on (2) speedy-cgi-perl is an alternative to > > libapache2-* modules? Shouldn't there be libapache2-mod-speedycgi > > instead? > > No, see #417545.
i understand. [...] > because both libapache2-mod-fcgid and libapache2-mod-fastcgi need > libcgi-fast-perl but the others don't. I've got it too. > > I don't understand why libapache-dbi-perl is an alternative to other > > packages in (5) and (6). > > Like the above: libapache2-mod-perl2 needs libapache-dbi-perl, the others > don't, so it's actually I thought, libapache-dbi-perl is a dependency for request-tracker itself. Obviously, I was wrong. > > Are these dependencies OK, or should they be fixed? > > Suggestions for better expressing the above in the dpkg dependency syntax > are welcome. It sounds like extremely hard logical puzzle :-) > Hope this explains, Yes, your answer explains everything. No more complaints from me. -- Krzysztof Raczkowski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
