Hi, Below is the answer from the upstream maintaining yum. What do you think now? I don't like this situation: a bug sent against the package I maintain, attached with a big intrusive patch, and the upstream rejecting the patch. Any suggestion?
Thomas > Why didn't you accept it? I have not sent the version with this patch in > Debian, so if you have a valid reason, I might reject it as well. If you > read the bug report above, seems that the submitter doesn't understand > either, and I'm quite puzzled too. Help on closing this bug would be > highly appreciated. If you could also have a quick look at the other 2 here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=yum > > I'd appreciate a lot as well if you were giving some pointers. It changes an enormous amount of expectations of previous use. It adds some bogus 'protocol types' hostfs/chrootfs and quite frankly the folks originally requesting it were not very nice. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
