Daniel Burrows <dburr...@algebraicthunk.net> writes: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:09:15AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org was heard to > say: >> Daniel Burrows <dburr...@debian.org> writes: >> >> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:50:04AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org was heard to >> > say: >> >> Hi. Are these really obsolete, or shoud I file a bug? >> >> # aptitude search ~o >> >> i A libgraphicsmagick2 - format-independent image processing - C shared >> >> library >> >> i A libicu38 - International Components for Unicode >> >> i A libvolume-id0 - libvolume_id shared library >> > >> > What does "apt-cache policy" print for each package? >> >> Indeed, only 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status, but how could important >> packages depend on obsolete packages, such that when I try to purge the >> obsoletes, it would take out major parts of the system: > > http://bugs.debian.org/522378 > > Daniel So many at once, I thought it was an aptitude bug!
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
