El vie, 03-04-2009 a las 23:05 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian escribió: > i've been looking into splitting ltspfsd into two packages, one with all the > binaries (ltspfsd-core), and one with all the udev and other scripts(ltspfsd). > > the two binaries are "ltspfsd" and "cdpinger", though both of them call other > scripts, so those also need be included in the ltspfsd-core package. so that > doesn't leave a whole lot of content for the ltspfsd package- just the ldm > hooks and other generic hooks for X sessions. > > though, with the switch to call cdpinger from udev, splitting the package > seems > more important now. > > ltspfsd-core would be able to no longer recommend ldm (the original reason for > this bug report), while ltspfsd would continue to do so. > > i've got most of the packaging done... so i guess i'll try and get a sponsor > to > upload it soon. > > live well, > vagrant
Very good news, thanks for spliting ltspfsd package. Can I will install ltspfsd-core (without other depends) in a Desktop computer? I'm working on TCOS upload, roadmap here: http://wiki.tcosproject.org/Tcos_Into_Debian Last week I have uploaded p910nd to Debian, this package can replace LTSP python script (jectdirect?? don't remember name) that redirect 9100 port to /dev/lp0: http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/p910nd Greetings -- http://soleup.eup.uva.es/mariodebian
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
