On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 08:35 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 19:41 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:27:51PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > Even assuming neither of these conform to the 'documented usage' of > > > kbuild (in which case I'd be interested in learning how to fix them), > > > > Documented usage for out of tree building is > > | make -C $DIR M=$(pwd) > > or similar. The drm tree does not even survive this test. > > It uses SUBDIRS=$(pwd), but changing that to M=$(pwd) fails in exactly > the same way. > > In fact, not even manually creating the removed symlinks > in /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64 works for me, see below. Looks > like there's no -I stanza for /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.29-1-*. And > even if I manually add -I stanzas so it can find all header files, it > still fails:
[...] Turns out this is a false alarm. :( I still had a hacked-up linux-kbuild-2.6.29 installed from when it wasn't available from the archive nor from kernel-archive.buildserver.net. After upgrading to the version now available in sid, both the VMware and DRM kernel modules build out of the box. So I guess consider this another request for providing linux-kbuild-* packages immediately wherever they're referenced by any linux-headers-* packages. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
