On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > 1/ Would running any file trigger based on the path of the modified > > alternative solve the problems in both cases you have encountered ? > > Not in the first case, but it was really ugly. Looking back at it, it > should have used another package instead of alternatives. It wouldn’t > work at all today with the upcoming changes in python-support. > > For the case I’m looking at currently (gnome-icon-theme), it would work > without any change if you simply activated the corresponding file > trigger, since there is already one here precisely to regenerate the > cache if needed. This looks like a really elegant solution to me.
It seems at least logical to go towards this solution in the long term but I don't think it's currently doable. At least not without prior-changes to dpkg-trigger. Guillem, your advice would be welcome here. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Contribuez à Debian et gagnez un cahier de l'admin Debian Lenny : http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2009/03/02/contribuer-a-debian-gagner-un-livre/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
