> Quoting Pavel (wy...@volny.cz): > > Package: samba > > Version: 2:3.2.5-4 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: patch > > > > > > Please consider following patch for debian stable: > > > I'm not in position to check upstream's BTS, but I guess this is fixed > > in 3.3.*, right?
No, i don't think so. But will be included in next samba release. > It seems like everybody is trying to make us fix each and every bug > > found after 3.2.5....slowly turning it into a fake 3.2.8...:-) My IQ led me to think myself, that if there is a bug, it should be fixed. But now i understand why the "bug graph" for stable only grows. Nobody is willing to fix stable and when there is enough bugs for stable, it's right time for new stable with just few bugs :-)) > If that bug is really severity normal, I don't really see enough > reasons to tag it for lenny. It's fine for me not to fix it. I've read how to make own package and made patched one. > I'd like to get more rationale to convince me that this is worth > trying to fix this in lenny. I'm not going to do that. Severity is probably not higher than normal. PS: If sombody got pissed off by my second paragraph - sorry. It was just a stupid sarcasm. I'm satisfied Debian user and appreciate that so many peoples gives their spare time for such a good OS as Debian is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
