On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:41:16AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > > retitle 520661 O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner > thanks > > orphaning back in case fresh blood wants to work on this. > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:35:53AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:17:31AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > > > > retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner > > > owner 520661 a...@debian.org > > > thanks > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > Package: wnpp > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > > > See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements and copyright > > > > files" on > > > > debian-devel to understand why. > > > > > > > > > > I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered > > > your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be > > > that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :). > > > > > > Can you make your git tree public somewhere so that the transition > > > will be technically more or less seemless? > > > > I'm not sure this is a good idea you jump in on xulrunner. Because that > > would mean more work for you, and I know you already have enough work, > > and that would also mean the mozilla team would basically not grow. > > > > Moreover, I'm not sure I will be able to keep my promise of actually > > stopping to maintain it... > > > > dude, if thats the case then don't orphan it :) ... or at least tell > me offline that you want to use this O: to attract contributors rather > than giving it away. > > In the end I still have the dream to eliminate one huge duplication of > work - which xulrunner is imo. If we could share sources packages here > and there it would be a huge win imo.
xulrunner is all but a duplication of work. It's even the contrary! At most, it is a duplication of source tarball. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
