On Mon Mar 23 17:12, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello Matthew, > > Matthew Johnson [2009-03-23 15:14 +0000]: > > It should have working introspection so that clients can wont out what > ^^^^ > This is "find", I presume.
Um... yes (-: > > Signals are all declared in an interface and emitted from an object. > > That's what I meant, there is nothing to query *against*. cupsd does > not provide any d-bus object. It opens the bus, fires the signal, and > tears it down again. It's really very primitive. > > So with no d-bus service being present, I still don't see a way how to > write a policy for it? I see, well, that's a bug which should be sent upstream. At the moment then it makes little difference as you say. When/if upstream have a valid dbus implementation though, there should also be a policy file which allows it. The reason for filing the bug in the first place is that this is a change in behaviour caused in the process of fixing a security issue. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
