Hello, On 2009 m. March 21 d., Saturday 01:51:21 you wrote: > #5 seems like a better approach than #4. I don't see a need to to both, > but it looks like your patch for #5 depends on your patch for #4. #5 depends on #4 because #5 also needs to be able restore $dh prior DH_INTERNAL_OPTIONS if -p/-a/-i/-s was specified on the command line. #5 is just an addition to #4, not a replacement.
-- Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
