tags 515110 + patch
thanks
On 2009-03-18 15:07 +0100, LaMont Jones wrote:
> tag 515110 + wontfix
> severity 515110 wishlist
> --
>
> It is perfectly reasonable to ask the kernel what we are, and build
> accordingly.
The kernel information is unreliable, it is better to use
dpkg-architecture and pass its output to 'configure'. Here is a patch
that fixes the FTBFS and should also enable cross-compilation:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff -u bind9-9.5.1.dfsg.P1/debian/rules bind9-9.5.1.dfsg.P1/debian/rules
--- bind9-9.5.1.dfsg.P1/debian/rules
+++ bind9-9.5.1.dfsg.P1/debian/rules
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
endif
export arch = $(DEB_HOST_ARCH)
+DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
+DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
+
ifneq (,$(findstring debug,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
DEBUG = -g
endif
@@ -27,6 +30,8 @@
configure-stamp:
dh_testdir
./configure --prefix=/usr \
+ --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) \
+ --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \
--mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info \
--sysconfdir=/etc/bind \
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Better still, report the failure upstream, since i386 userland and
x86_64 kernel is a valid combination that should work.
> Given the valid solution of using linux32, I don't see that this is
> even a bug. Leaving it open anyway, but won't be fixing it.
So that the bind9 will eventually FTBFS on puccini? Great. :-/
Regards,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
