On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Michael Pavletich <pcpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, here are the results from etch > > 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1mepis1 > mich...@mikepav:~/Pictures/Sand&Water$ time sh script.sh > > real 0m2.029s > user 0m1.870s > sys 0m0.137s
Ok the script show no regression and even an improvment :( I suppose it is dependant of the image input. Basically your program run this stuff in a loop. Will try to create a new test case. But it will be difficult to pin point where is the regression. They are also improvment with new version. > I realised I had done the testing wrong, you asked me to post only the > second results, which I now understand to be the second run of the > script. Correct me if I am wrong here and I will retest. The results > from the etch test above was the second run of the script, the below > results are from the 2nd run with the backported version, in case you > need it. > > Openmp Compiled for Mepis8 (Lenny base, see below for additional deps) > 7:6.4.7.10-0mlrepo1 > mich...@mikepav:~/Pictures/Sand&Water$ time sh script.sh > > real 0m1.236s > user 0m1.300s > sys 0m0.157s > > Experimental toasted my system with too many critical system > components removed, so I might have a go at downloading and installing > experimental, though I'm certain I will not be able to do this in good > time due to my existing schedules. > > > Mike P > > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
