2009/3/16 Frank Lichtenheld <dj...@debian.org>: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 01:35:55PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: >> Please remove the source package pocketpc-binutils. I've also >> requested the removal of its only reverse dependency pocketpc-gcc. >> These toolchains are based on an obsolete version of GCC. > > There is an additional reverse-dependency: pocketpc-sdk
Shaun Jackman wrote... >> The Pocket PC toolchain has been essentially unmaintained for a long >> time. I haven't had a Pocket PC device in years. I've requested that >> the pocketpc toolchain be removed from the Debian's unstable archive. >> The packages will still be available in etch and lenny. >> >> The bug numbers requesting removal from the archive are 519874, >> 519875, and 519877 for the packages pocketpc-binutils, pocketpc-gas >> and pocketpc-gcc. You are the maintainer of the package pocketpc-sdk. >> Should I request its removal as well? 2009/3/15 Eric House <eeho...@eehouse.org>: > I think so. > > Just FYI, last week I started filling out an ITP for the cegcc toolchain. > After using it for two years and shipping a release with it I finally > managed to build the damn thing and so ought to be able to get it into > Debian. The upstream is active and supportive of my packaging it, so it > seems a worthy successor. > > --Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
