On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 03:35 -0400, Eduardo Sachs wrote: > > It's good to have a polyglot in the package maintenance team..:-) > > > > (Eduardo: I have less knowledge of pt_BR than Steve has, but the page > > you mention seems to point to upstream's bug #5810....however I can't > > understand if what's described in upstream bug 5810 is also what you > > report in this Debian bug report #519570) > > > > The bug #5810 is a little confusing, is the best guide by the Debian bug > report #519570. > > > ...and congratulations for that nice documentation...from what I can > > understand this is a very comprehensive description of your setup. > > I wish I find the same in French..:) > > > > My documentation for Debian Etch is ready, but, for Debian Lenny is > still not completed. > > Indeed, has no documentation about Samba PDC Kerberized in the Internet, > I think only my, but, for Active Directory have many documentations.
That is because aside from interesting hacks with Linux clients, the only Samba Kerberised DC is Samba4. (and yes, running Heimdal as the KDC and Samba for windows works, but it isn't a kerberised DC). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
