This one time, at band camp, Adrian Bunk said: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:40:19PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > > Tracker itself does not link against libssl. Problems seems to be, that it > > uses > > libraptor, which itself uses libcurl3, that then pulls libssl. > > > > I don't see, how I can do something about that within the tracker package. > > FWIW, > > the tracker debian package has no dependency on libssl. > > > > Could you clarify, where you see the license violation. > > OpenSSL has a not GPL compatible licence, and tracker is a GPLed program > that is (through intermediate libraries) linked with OpenSSL.
Another way to ask the question is: Since the package linking to libssl is out of the control of the tracker maintainer, in what way is this helpful? Shouldn't the report go against that library? Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sg...@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
