Hi, Ben Finney wrote: > > > The other is just the upstream Subversion respository, > > > ‘svn://svn.gnome.org/svn/ooo-build/branches/ooo-build-3-0-1’. That > > > is not the Debian package management branch, so should not be in > > > the ‘Vcs-Foo’ control field. > > > > This is not exactly true. debian/ is useless without the ooo-build > > checkout. This will be fixed when we ever switch back to vanilla OOo > > and thus will have all our patches in debian/patches, but until that > > we need debian/ AND ooo-build, and those are in different repos... > > The ‘Vcs-Foo’ field can point to a branch that is the Debian packaging > only, that's fine. I presume you're using ‘bzr-buildpackage’ or the > like, to merge the original source archive with the Debian packaging?
Actually, no :) I create a orig, extract it and add ooo-build and debian. (or simply extract the new orig over the old tree and remove the old tarballs) ooo-build and debian both are in the .diff.gz (currently) > That just needs to be in a ‘get-orig-source’ target, to get the > upstream VCS version to an original source archive. Documenting the Well, the .orig.tar.gz just contains the original source :). No business of ooo-build and debian in there (well, one can argue that ooo-build shuld be in there, though, but unless we stick to go-oo releases we then can't easily svn up it :) ) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
