Luca Capello wrote: > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 > Errors were encountered while processing: > slime > [master 3a1db55] committing changes in /etc after apt run > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
The changes have been made by an apt run that etckeeper knows about, even though it failed. So why should etckeeper not commit them? -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
