reassign 519316 inetutils-inetd thanks On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:18:18PM -0500, Dale wrote: > Package: swat > Version: 2:3.2.5-4 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable
> I have several squeeze systems, but only one on which swat was unusable. > Netstat indicated that that swat was listening on tcp6 901 instead of tcp > 901. Looking for differences, I noticed that the broken system had > inetutils-inetd installed instead of openbsd-inetd. Installing > openbsd-inetd on the broken system made swat usable again. Not a bug in swat. Swat uses the standard, documented arguments to update-inetd; if inetutils-inetd is interpreting this in a way that it only binds to IPv6 interfaces and not IPv4 interfaces, that's an inetutils-inetd bug. I can reproduce the failure mode here, but I don't see from an strace what inetutils-inetd is doing wrong; it seems to be doing the same sort of socket() and bind() calls as other services that do work with ipv6. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
