-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Simon Huggins wrote: > Right, but if you have to explicitly run this so I don't think this is a > bug. Anyone running a command called update-menus and expecting nothing > to happen is a bit broken in my opinion :)
The problem is about what is supposed to be updated. To me, there's nothing wrong of course with updating menudefs.hook, but I don't like the idea of overwriting users' menu.xml with the system default each time they run update-menus. If they want to use the system default, it would be quicker to rm those files. > I suppose we could rename the old menu if it exists perhaps. Good idea, it would prevent from loosing data. > Will mean that running it as root never works too as the menudefs.hook > will be generated but the menu.xml won't be overwritten. The idea about the w flag is to make the file rw by default, and when the user sets -w on it it won't update any more. > Yeah I'm not convinced by it. I think I'll tag this wontfix for now. No problem. Maybe it should be discussed with update-menus system authors. Vincent Pelletier -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCvX+eFEQoKRQyjtURAotfAJ9Ysop+tk+peyZvUAhVzj8kkseuPgCdE7Md YIGCj+StHAMqP/TUWa1wtE0= =IQSb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
