10 березня 2009 о 19:25 +0100 Kurt Roeckx написав(-ла): > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:01:52AM +0100, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > > Hello Kurt, > > > > 23 ?????? 2007 ? 13:23 +0100 Kurt Roeckx ???????(-??): > > > I hope your package is not directly making use of libebl but really > > > only uses libdw. Once systemtap does not need (it's headers) anymore, > > > I intend change in such a way that you can't use it's headers anymore, > > > probably by merging the whole thing in libdw. > > I recently removed last #include of libebl headers from systemtap. > > It is also in upstream repository. So libebl-dev can disappear. > > So I have 2 packages build depending on libebl-dev now: > - dwarves-dfsg > - systemtap > > I'm guessing that now the only reason to have that dependency > is to get /usr/lib/libebl.a for linking. And that neither > package is making use of /usr/include/elfutils/libebl.h That is true for systemtap.
> > So what I would like to do is drop the libebl-dev package and > have /usr/lib/libebl.a integrated into /usr/lib/libdw.a so that > you only have to use -ldw. > > Please let me know if this is acceptable for you or not. Yep, that fine with me. But what about .so? Is it still unstable? > > > PS: I'm preparing an upload of 0.140. > > > Kurt > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
