Hmmm...
Perhaps my problem is elsewhere then.

Invoking the following command:
gpg --list-key B16CCA95 --no-default-keyring --keyring
/usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg

I get that the expiration date is 2009-12-22, the new (correct) one.

How is this even possible?
I changed the expiration date 2 days ago.
I've uploaded my new public key to hkp://keyring.debian.org .

But still, the last change to debian-maintainers was on feb. 24th.
So i don't understand how /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg
could contain my new expiration date.

I also figure there's still something wrong as i didn't get any email
(either accept or reject) for the latest dput i did.

If you have any hints as to what i'm doing wrong, it'd be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,

-Pascal

On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Joey Hess <jo...@debian.org> wrote:
> Christoph Berg wrote:
>> That's a jetring bug. It needs to be taught that updated expiration
>> dates are a change.
>
> When presented with two keyrings, in which a key's expiry date has
> changed, jetring-gen will generate two changesets. The first deletes
> the key, the second adds back the new version.
>
> --
> see shy jo
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFJtZp+d8HHehbQuO8RAgutAJ969v0TQSkDxeSiZeJNKgjCZ9iO+ACg25Ib
> 2rfhILzbxPieUbzHR+A3gco=
> =QwTR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>



-- 
Homepage (http://organact.mine.nu)
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)
LACIME: École de technologie supérieure (http://lacime.etsmtl.ca)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to