On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:35:29PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > I guess it means changing the default for ld, which is currently set to > not generating them by default, AFAICT. Should I report another bug > against binutils, then?
IMO yes. > This would be nice. Also, looking at the documentation, it would be a > very elegant way to store the debugging symbols for many versions in a > single online directory structure. There wouldn’t be a need to create a > virtual filesystem layout pointing to the correct debugging symbols > since the build IDs are unique. If you're interested in this subject, you may want to see what Fedora has done with them. They have some mechanism for making GDB report which debuginfo RPMs you ought to install. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
