Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Thanks, but that's not accurate, since --reply=no has no effect >> if it *precedes* a -i (aka --reply=query) option, and if it >> follows -i, then the -i is disregarded. > > Why not just say that -i/-f/--reply override each other and the last one > wins?
The --help output already mentions that -i and -f each have --reply=... equivalents, but I'd welcome a specific addition to that effect. Nonetheless, the explanation I added is needed to explain what --reply=no actually does, since people often don't know that mv prompts sometimes even when -i (or equiv) has not been specified. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
